top of page

Lasting Legacies
 

During Orca Month in 2023, through stories and videos, we'll honor the Lasting Legacies of the Southern Resident orcas and celebrate the legacy of the 50th anniversary of the Endangered Species Act.

Coming soon!

 

  • Nicole Loeffler-Gladstone

Did you know that Washington recently passed two new bans on certain types of packaging products? These packaging laws are intended to protect people from harmful substances like Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of about 15,000 “forever chemicals.” They're also designed to reduce pollution entering our waterways and ultimately impacting aquatic life.


Check out the story below, written by Puget Soundkeeper's Communications Manager Nicole Loeffler-Gladstone.


Photo courtesy Pixabay.


Packaging Bans

As of May 1, 2024, the following packaging and food service products are banned if they have PFAS intentionally added:

  • Bags and sleeves.

  • Bowls.

  • Flat service ware, including items like plates and trays.

  • Open-top containers, like French fry cartons and food cups.

  • Closed containers, like clamshells.

They join wraps, plates, food boats, and pizza boxes, which came under Washington's 2023 PFAS ban.


Beginning June 1, 2024 certain expanded polystyrene (EPS) products are also banned. These include:

  • Cups.

  • Plates.

  • To-go clamshells.

  • Trays.

  • Food containers.

  • Single-use coolers.

They join EPS packing peanuts, which were already banned in Washington.


EPS is often called Styrofoam, but that refers to a specific brand name. The product is rarely included in curbside recycling programs because of the high cost of recycling, and it's a common pollutant on Puget Sound beaches. EPS breaks down into small pieces in the environment, and wildlife can mistake it for food.



Alternative Single-Use Packaging

Beginning in January, 2024, Washington requires compostable products to be clearly labeled and meet certain standards. Consumers should look for compostable products with the right labeling features (green, beige, or brown color or striping, certifier logo, and the word “compostable”).

 

Avoid manufacturer attempts to “greenwash” their products with words like “biodegradable” or “degradable.” Just because a thin film bag is green doesn't mean it's compostable! Look for the other indicators and be sure to check your municipality's waste management rules before chucking something in your curbside green bin.

 

The City of Seattle says that municipal compost can become contaminated with plastics and other non-compostable materials. This debris ends up as trash in our landscape, eventually breaking down into microplastics.


Tackling Toxics

As you head into a summer of picnics, cookouts, and outdoor dining, take a moment to consider ways you can opt for reusable containers that are free from toxic chemicals. Orca Salmon Alliance member Toxic Free Future has lots of great resources on their website, with tips for reducing and minimizing toxic exposure at home. And our friends at Zero Waste Washington share FAQs for folks wondering about reuse and repair, low-waste options and more.

 

Ultimately, though, we can't shop our way out of exposure to toxic chemicals. As Toxic Free Future says, consumers should be able to trust that manufacturers will avoid adding deadly or dangerous substances to their products. Grassroots advocacy and legislation play an important role in regulating and ultimately removing these chemicals from our bodies and environment.

 

Orca Salmon Alliance's 2024 call-to-action asks the Washington Department of Ecology to ban certain chemicals that have a known toxic effect on aquatic life. Click here to learn more and take action.  

  • Rein Attemann

In January 2020, the Suquamish Tribe, Washington Environmental Council, and Puget Soundkeeper reached a settlement agreement with the US Navy to clean up and prevent toxic waste from illegal ship scrapping activities, in a lawsuit filed in 2017. The Navy violated the Clean Water Act by discharging contaminated hull waste from the ex-Independence into Sinclair Inlet without a Clean Water Act permit.


Read the full story below, written by Washington Conservation Action’s Puget Sound Senior Campaign Manager Rein Attemann.


Photo: Suquamish canoes travel the waters of Puget Sound during the 2019 annual Canoe Journey. Photo courtesy of the Suquamish Tribe.


In January 2020, the Suquamish Tribe, Washington Environmental Council, and Puget Soundkeeper reached a settlement agreement with the US Navy to clean up and prevent toxic waste from illegal ship scrapping activities, in a lawsuit filed in 2017. The Navy violated the Clean Water Act by discharging contaminated hull waste from the ex-Independence into Sinclair Inlet without a Clean Water Act permit. The Navy scraped about 73 dump truck loads of materials from the hull of the Ex-Independence, a decommissioned aircraft carrier coated in toxic anti-fouling paint. While the Navy claimed they would be “gently brushing” the hull to remove materials before towing the ship to be broken up in Texas, we realized that barnacles and other hard materials encrusting the ship would need much more abrasive techniques, which would discharge toxic hull paint into the waters of Sinclair Inlet, part of Puget Sound.


The Navy proceeded with this action even after the Suquamish Tribe identified water quality concerns that would impact fish and other aquatic life, and even after newspaper articles that brought the Navy’s actions to light. Unfortunately, the only remedy was legal action, as we learned that the Navy intended to continue these types of actions on multiple decommissioned ships for years to come, which would have released even more toxics into Puget Sound. For context, the waters and sediments of Sinclair Inlet have the highest levels of copper, a common component of anti-fouling paints, in all of Puget Sound.


In the settlement agreement, the Suquamish Tribe, WEC, and Puget Soundkeeper prevented untold future contamination through a 10-year moratorium and compelled the Navy to clean up its own mess. Boaters in the region know that cleaning hulls must be done in drydock conditions and that toxic boat paint needs to be disposed of properly to prevent contamination of nearby lands and waters, plus the wildlife and people that rely on clean water.




  • Kathleen Callaghy

Did you know that derelict boats and structures contribute to water toxicity? Drifting, beached, broken-up or sunken vessels are filled with toxic chemicals, including oil, diesel, contaminated water, flammable liquids, antifreeze, toxic cleaning supplies, batteries, paint and varnish.


Read the full story below, written by Defenders of Wildlife's Northwest Representative Kathleen Callaghy.


Photo courtesy Washington State Department of Natural Resources.


Did you know that derelict boats and structures contribute to water toxicity? Drifting, beached, broken-up or sunken vessels are filled with toxic chemicals, including oil, diesel, contaminated water, flammable liquids, antifreeze, toxic cleaning supplies, batteries, paint and varnish. The same is true of dock or pier pilings, which are often coated in wood preservatives such as creosote. These substances leach into the water over time, building up in aquatic organisms that digest or absorb them - filtering all the way up the food chain to salmon and orca.


The good news is that Washington’s Department of Natural Resources (@[DNR acct]) works to remove vessels that have become abandoned or derelict to keep pollution out of marine habitats through their Derelict Vessel Removal Program (DVRP). The Vessel Turn-in Program also offers boat owners with insufficient funds an opportunity to apply for assistance in legally disposing of their vessels!


Learn more about the Derelict Vessel Removal Program:


Learn more about creosote:


bottom of page